*The Forum Rules.
Yep, rules. Read 'em. Abide by 'em. Or your sea creature powers may be revoked. Temporarily, or for good.
1. New to the lounge? Get started here. Learn which category to post your note in, and create a forum signature.
2. Spam: just don't do it. Thou also shalt not fill the forums with multiple threads on the same topic or sockpuppet.
3. Thou shalt not flame, harass, denigrate, spam, malign, or otherwise finger-point and name-call at ANYONE. This one's a biggy. This too can get you banned.
4. Squidstaff love interacting with smart front-line people, so they stop by the forums from time to time to hear your ideas and share updates. However, this isn't the place to post bugs or solicit admin action. Please send those requests through our feedback link.
5. The SquidU forum is a place for users to interact, to share ideas and inspiration (and yes, gripes... maybe another lensmaster can help) and have fun with their lenses. Try searching for an answer or visiting The Answer Deck.
Jackclee suggested that I split my lens http://www.squidoo.com/whomadegod/ into several smaller, more focused lenses. I am seriously thinking about doing this because it would give me a more focused lens, plus two or three additional lenses.
What do others think? Has anyone done a similar thing with a lens of theirs - what happened initially - did the lens rank go up or down? Did it attract more traffic or less?
It would be great to learn from others opinions, knowledge and experience. Thanks :-)
Offline
I highly recommend that you do split your topic into sub-topics by way of additional lenses.
I don't think your lens rank will drop at all through this method. Not to mention, you would now have more lenses with similiar rankings.
That means more shared ad-sense revenue per month. I'm sure others would agree.
Bill
Offline

I would, instead of splitting the lens up, make more lenses on the topic.
Offline
Your lens could use a little "niching," for example focus more on the book and turn some of the additional questions and resources into a separate lens (ie Creation Museum News Posts, have you ever written a Christian book, etc.) I would recommend that sense of splitting it up. Not to make it smaller but to focus each lens more.
~Kimberly
Offline
Thanks wstrauss73 for your advice on the lensrank.
Thanks KimberlyDawnWells for your suggestions on new lens topics.
I also appreciate your comment MrLewisSmile, as I have already made one additional lens branching off from this one. Why would you keep the original lens at the current size? I'd be interested to know what you see as the advantages of this. One person told me it may be to slow to load for people without broadband. What are your thoughts?
Much appreciated :-)
Offline

MrLewisSmile wrote:
I would, instead of splitting the lens up, make more lenses on the topic.
"Competing with yourself" is one way to get more traffic and money...
Offline
Hi thefluffanutta,
Could you please expand on the comment "Competing with yourself" is one way to get more traffic and money...
Thanks :-)
Offline

Waterwalker_Publishing wrote:
Hi thefluffanutta,
Could you please expand on the comment "Competing with yourself" is one way to get more traffic and money...
Thanks :-)
Competing with yourself.
When no matter where people look, they just keep finding information written by you ![]()
Last edited by MrLewisSmile (03/30/2007 4:05 am)
Offline

I would keep the lens as it is because if it is getting you visitors - GREAT.
I would then put a Featured Lens module at the very top (right under the intro) and near the bottom (you can find the module only under the "NEW" tab when you're adding modules), and in it I would feature the 4 or 5 other lenses with a title something like "Other Visitors Also Visited:".
The visitor would then see my 4 or 5 related lenses. And I would do this on each of the 5 lenses.
Don't break down a winning lens if you have one! Just make more on the subject and link them all together!
Offline
Great info MrLewisSmile. Thanks heaps for your help :-)
Offline
Wow, you're getting lots of great feedback !
I agree with what's being said. If anyone would know, it would be these guys.
Definitely don't change too much about your original lens if it's doing fine, as Lewis said.
And there's no rules against monopolizing here so go right ahead and make as many similiar based lenses as you want. A little extra creativity may be needed in order for them to look and seem slightly different.
Good Luck!
Bill
Offline
Please make them more than just 'slightly different' - this is one of the problems we are having at the moment. I have just banned a number of lensmasters from my groups because all they produced was a 'slightly different' variation on an increasingly boring theme. I'm all in favour of spinning lenses off a successful but overly large lens but new and/or varied content please. Fine if some modules overlap but the bulk of it should be new - or am I being too picky here?
Offline
flaminglacer wrote:
Please make them more than just 'slightly different' - this is one of the problems we are having at the moment. I have just banned a number of lensmasters from my groups because all they produced was a 'slightly different' variation on an increasingly boring theme. I'm all in favour of spinning lenses off a successful but overly large lens but new and/or varied content please. Fine if some modules overlap but the bulk of it should be new - or am I being too picky here?
No, you're not being too picky at all. I think that a groupmaster who holds to higher standards is going to wind up with a stronger group of lenses in the long run.
Part of why I created my 100 Best Movie Lenses was to give what I felt were better movie lenses a showcase without dozens of repetitive and annoying "download movies" lenses hogging any of the limelight.
Also, when you see a lens that you think is "spammy" remember to report it as such. That's really the best way to increase the number of original and quality lenses.
Offline
Maybe not the thread for this but it does follow on from Rachel's post. I am about to post some fairly stringent rules that lens will be expected to adhere to if they want to be part of my groups. I'm still finalising them but will post them in a more appropriate thread when I have them done. I do make a point of visiting EVERY lens that applies, and I rate, blurb etc. One or two may have got past whilst I have been unwell but they will be removed, reported etc etc as I catch up with them. I think we owe it to ourselves to keep the standards high - and on a purely personal note I hate being played as a sucker! ![]()
Offline
My lenses "AllAboutTraffic" and "Domains4Dummies" are both large subjects splitting naturally into a raft of sub-topics. The total scope of each topic is way too large and unwieldy for a single Squidoo lens.
I can't complete all the sub-topic articles on day one, (and there's pelnty more to add), so decided to publish as a part series. This has the advantage of flexibility and also getting something published quickly.
I started to implement "AllAboutTraffic" as Squidoo based "chapter lenses" linked from a "contents" summary in the master lens. I'm starting to have second thoughts about this structure and wonder if a series of more independent lenses might not be just as effective and more flexible to manage.
"Domains4Dummies" is more commercial in nature and is based instead aound a group of blogs containing full length articles, indexed by article summaries posted in the Squidoo lens.
Q1 Do hierarchical set ups such as these make sense for Squidoo? Or, do better ways of structuring large topics leap to mind?
Q2 I need reader input to democratize sub-topic implementation - and drive me to focus on matters of widest interest. To capture feedback systematically I want to build a survey module into the lens.
Can anybody suggest "how to" references about integrating survey software into Squidoo?
Offline
Here's another option for multiple lenses on related topics.
I started with one lens about Las Vegas. Added four more. And then four more after that.
When I met people offline at networking events, I realized I had trouble remembering all the names and URLs (web addresses). And so did the people I met.
So I tried adding 'Google Apps for your Domain' to Squidoo, and created a fairly extensive website made almost exclusively out of Squidoo lenses.
Recently I added 5 more merchant-oriented lenses to create an online mall offering everything FOR and ABOUT Las Vegas.
You can see the final result at FirstTimeInLasVegas - link below.
SuperchargeSquidoo.com is a 11-chapter/lens Squidbook that describes the general concepts for building multi-lens presentations, books, tutorials, shopping malls and more using Squidoo with Google Apps and Google Custom Search.
Robert
Last edited by RobertACarr (08/17/2007 1:08 am)
Offline

I just split out a lens from my cake lens here. I am considering breaking out more stuff since the page is so large. My cake lens has great rankings and traffic so I am afraid to mess with it too much, but I am trying to move some stuff onto other lenses.
Last edited by Janet21 (08/16/2007 7:30 am)
Offline
My Lens is not about multiple topics It is about ONE topic only Yet I have created (or tried) a Squid book of sorts (I hope)
All of the pages are totally different and unique. Yet they still are about the same Topic or Subject.
Not trying to steal any glory or offend but would certainly appreciate some input, thoughts and ideas for improvement.
I have added my original lens about the same Topic and not sure if I should remove/delete it or not
http://www.squidoo.com/OBAInfo/
Wendy
Offline
Hi Wenfri,
I think you've done a fantastic job so far with your lenses.
Since you have a business with several lenses, you might consider doing what I did - using Google Apps. Just do it in small steps.
1. If you haven't done so already, register a domain name for Online Business Alliance through Google Apps. Chapter 2 of SuperchargeSquidoo.com explains the steps. Ony US$10 to register domain name through Google Apps - about $8 savings over registering directly with GoDaddy.com. Google does all the technical setup automatically for you. For $10, it's worth taking a chance and experimenting.
2. Create an admin account for your new website. You can also create up to 200 other GMail email accounts on your domain for free. Select one as your main email address for customers. Then open a new Squidoo account using that email address. Now your email address matches your domain name.
3. After a couple of days (give Squidoo time to update its records), transfer your OBA lenses to the new account. Now when anyone sends you an email, they are using your OBA business email. And all of your responses to inquiries use that email account. Very professional looking.
4. Play around with Page Creator to make a home page. Simply select a template and fill in text, pictures, links, whatever. Especially link all your lenses to this web page. Because Google owns Google Apps, Google usually crawls the Google Apps web page(s) within a few days, so you get into Google Search much faster than with other web site hosts.
This is a simple way to get started building a full-blown business web site. You can probably do most of this quicker than the time it took me to write this message.
You do all these processes by selecting options from menus. Very simple. There are free online tutorials for almost all this. Links for the Google tutorials, Help sections, Discussions Groups and teaching videos are all in the chapters at SuperchargeSquidoo.com.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Robert
Last edited by RobertACarr (08/17/2007 1:33 am)
Offline