*The Forum Rules.
Yep, rules. Read 'em. Abide by 'em. Or your sea creature powers may be revoked. Temporarily, or for good.
1. New to the lounge? Get started here. Learn which category to post your note in, and create a forum signature.
2. Spam: just don't do it. Thou also shalt not fill the forums with multiple threads on the same topic, sockpuppet, or link to irrelevant and non-Squidoo sites (includes signatures).
3. Thou shalt not flame, harass, denigrate, spam, malign, or otherwise finger-point and name-call at ANYONE. This one's a biggy. This too can get you banned.
4. Squidstaff love interacting with smart front-line people, so they stop by the forums from time to time to hear your ideas and share updates. However, this isn't the place to post bugs or solicit admin action. Please send those requests through our feedback link.
5. The SquidU forum is a place for users to interact, to share ideas and inspiration (and yes, gripes... maybe another lensmaster can help) and have fun with their lenses. Try searching for an answer or visiting The Answer Deck.
This is something that has been bugging me for a long time and I plan to write an article on Squidlog about it.
Does anyone really know the answer as to how far a recipe can be copyrighted? Or if indeed it can be?
Squidoo has some great recipe lenses. I love the ones that interweave family history and traditions into the content. But...
I also come across lenses where the recipe and the method can be found all over the internet. Exact list of ingredients, exact method, copied and pasted. No acknowledgement of the source.
Isn't this plagiarism? Isn't it breach of copyright?
I reproduced a pumpkin recipe on my Autumn Lens. I acknowledged the source and I linked to an Amazon module with a link to the book it came from. Is this OK?
I got a great recipe book in my Christmas stocking. It has a copyright notice. Surely the same applies on the net?
In what circumstances could I make a lens about one of the recipes from this book? Most recipes I use I end up adapting by leaving out ingredients we do not like and adding others. Often I change the method. Would it then be OK to make a lens? Do I need to acknowledge the source? By changing the ingredients and method does this then become MY recipe?
Help......... ![]()
Offline
I had a look at the German spoken discussions on the net about this. I would see some distinctions:
1. To copy recipes word by word from a cook book or any other source and republish them as Squidoo lens is most likely a violation of copyright.
But this is independent from the fact that the stolen content is a recipe.
2. recipes in general are not copyrighted..even though there are some people interested to copyright even recipes in order to capitalise on that.
Hopefully this will never happen. The list of the ingredients of a recipe cannot be protected by copyright at present, as far as I understand.
Publishing the list of ingredients and to add information about the cooking process in your own words is probably the right way to go.
Offline
This is probably not the best comparison, but, to me, copyrighting a recipe would kind of be like trying to copyright the steps and list of parts to fix something on a car. I agree with EditionH, though, that any text other than the list of ingredients and the basic steps to preparing the dish should be in one's own words. And I also think it doesn't hurt to cite the source where YOU found the recipe (unless it's a family hand-me-down, which you can simply state) ... even though that source certainly might not be the original source either. Besides, citing the source, especially if it's a cookbook, can give you a good segway to an Amazon Spotlight module to promote that cookbook.
But I don't know what specific rules might apply to recipes. This just seems like common sense sort of stuff to me. I would think that if a chef or cook didn't want a certain recipe to get "out there," he or she wouldn't publish it anywhere.
Online
Here's what I found from the U.S. Copyright Office Website (on recipes):
"Mere listings of ingredients as in recipes, formulas, compounds, or prescriptions are not subject to copyright protection. However, when a recipe or formula is accompanied by substantial literary expression in the form of an explanation or directions, or when there is a combination of recipes, as in a cookbook, there may be a basis for copyright protection.
Protection under the copyright law (title 17 of the U.S. Code, section 102) extends only to 'original works of authorship' that are fixed in a tangible form (a copy). 'Original' means merely that the author produced the work by his own intellectual effort, as distinguished from copying an existing work. Copyright protection may extend to a description, explanation, or illustration, assuming that the requirements of the copyright law are met."
So, it seems that what others have said here about writing the description in your own words is accurate. I've also read that it's wise to use terms like "based on" or "modified from" (and then cite your original source) anyway.
Offline
I have often wondered about this too and had heard the same thing, that recipes themselves cannot be copyrighted. I think it is important to distinguish the difference between copying just the recipe itself or the entire source from which it came. As EditionH mentioned, if you want to publish a recipe or cookbook, it is best to add your own words to the description and/or provide some sort of story behind why you chose that recipe.
I guess where the copyright infringement would apply is when a recipe, that has been used in products sold thru large marketing efforts(such as the case with Paul Newman's sauces, KFC, Coca-cola, etc. etc) is published by a third party and claimed as their own.
Offline
Thank you guys - this is all really helpful. I too had heard that a list of ingredients cant be copyrighted but that it makes sense to rewrite the method in your own words.
Just want to emphasise that I personally have no problem with all the great recipe lenses out there that always give credit to and cite their sources - or should that be sauces ![]()
Offline
I think coca cola doesn't have a copyright or trademark on their recipe. I believe it's because after 17 years it goes into public domain. They keep the recipe a secret because of that.
Offline
I doubt whether a recipe could be copyright under UK law as it ins't possible to copyright business processes and I suspect a recipe could full under that. I suspect to attract copyright, a work would have to do more than list ingredients and instructions and that it would often be OK to copy that word for word.
The exceptions would be things pictures (separate rules apply as often discussed) and things like "How I make my grandmother's scones" which includes literary input in things like "She taught me to stir the mixture clockwise believing ..." The recipe would still not be copyright, but the instructions would be.
Kate
Caveat: I am not a lawyer and am not offering legal advice
Offline
Copyright Information & Recipes for the USA
“Mere listings of ingredients as in recipes, formulas, compounds, or prescriptions are not subject to copyright protection. However, when a recipe or formula is accompanied by substantial literary expression in the form of an explanation or directions, or when there is a combination of recipes, as in a cookbook, there may be a basis for copyright protection� .
U.S. Copyright Office Website
Hope this helps, AJ ![]()
Last edited by prosperity66 (01/05/2010 3:52 pm)
Offline
Kharadriisa wrote:
I think coca cola doesn't have a copyright or trademark on their recipe. I believe it's because after 17 years it goes into public domain. They keep the recipe a secret because of that.
Under what circumstances does something go into public domain under 17 years? I've never heard of that.
Copyright is generally 70 years after the death of the author, except in the case of works for hire, when it's even longer. Of course that's US copyright; donno about other countries.
Trademarks are something separate, and companies carefully protect them for generations. They don't lose 'em after 17 years. Look at Ford Motors, for example... or for that matter, Microsoft!
There's one other thing that might come into play here, and I don't know the legalities involved: patents. I believe that formulas like Coca-Cola may be patented. I wonder if that could also be true of some recipes.
Last edited by Greekgeek (01/05/2010 4:04 pm)
Online
Very good topic to bring forward AJ.
I've been wondering about the same
Thank to everyone for the information!
Online
Thanks for bringing this up AJ. I, too, have wondered about this. And thanks to those who posted the U.S. Copyright info.
Offline
Some people who publish recipes don't even realize that they were originally in printed form......I have a recipe that I was going to publish, but hadn't got around to. It was written down on a piece of paper by my hubby's great aunt and she was 'famous' in his hometown for it, I had planned to put in a little antedote about her and include the recipe - lucky I didn't because earlier this year I was looking through an old recipe book and there it was - word for word! Who knows if someone else took Loma's recipe or if she copied it off of them ![]()
It's good to know that what I had read else where about a list of ingredients not being subject to copyright appears to be correct though.
Offline
I am going to be posting the article on SquidLog next week, so if anyone else has any views on this, now is the time to add them.
Thanks everyone who has contributed so far ![]()
Offline
Can't wait to read that article!
Offline
People might wish to reflect on the fact that copyright works both ways. If recipes cannot be copyrighted, then recipes in a lens aren't copyright either so it's OK for people to lift those recipes for their own lens. It means the success of recipe lenses comes down very much to the SEO ability of lensmasters.
Kate
Offline
It's published:
http://squidlog.net/blog/ajs-musings/re … tos-issues
Thank you everyone who contributed. I am sorry I could not quote everyone but your contributions are much appreciated.
Leanne there is a specific message for you in the article ![]()
Offline