You are not logged in.

Announcement

Please welcome your community-elected SquidU Leadership Council!


SQUIDU FORUM RULES

1. New to the Lensmaster Lounge? Introduce yourself. Share a little bit about who you are, and talk about what kinds of lenses you're creating over on Squidoo.
2. Your SquidU username is the same as your Squidoo username. Anything you say or do here reflects on your reputation, well, everywhere.
3. No flaming, harassing, or maligning other users here. No spam either.
4. Feel free to post a comment in any discussion. Think twice and take a deep breath before posting something if you're angry.
5. Before starting a new discussion, please check recent discussions to make sure you're not posting on a redundant topic.
6. This is not an officially-run Squidoo forum. This isn't the place to post bug reports or solicit admin action from Squidoo officials. This is a place for lensmasters, run by volunteer lensmasters, organized to help you meet other lensmasters and get and share help about making Squidoo lenses.
Bonus: This is a community, just like the neighborhood you belong to offline. Day in and day out you'll likely run in to the same faces, the same people, and many diverse opinions. It's up to you to help make it a place you enjoy coming back to, by participating in discussions you enjoy and interacting with the people you respect.

#1 08/09/2009 11:14 am

SilverBlueRose
Newbie.
Registered: 12/31/1969
Posts: 60

What do people think of PotPieGirls latest article on her blog..

... about boycotting Squidoo?

http://www.potpiegirl.com/2009/08/shoul … t-squidoo/

Is she just letting off steam or is she serious?

Offline

 

#2 08/09/2009 11:19 am

Christene
Top Contributor
From: MA
Registered: 02/06/2007
Posts: 6942

Re: What do people think of PotPieGirls latest article on her blog..

I only skimmed it...

Let them boycott...there will be less junk to wade through.

Offline

 

#3 08/09/2009 11:28 am

SilverBlueRose
Newbie.
Registered: 12/31/1969
Posts: 60

Re: What do people think of PotPieGirls latest article on her blog..

Christene wrote:

I only skimmed it...

Let them boycott...there will be less junk to wade through.

I also thought that. If all those marketers decided that Squidoo should be dumped, it might be the making of Squidoo! 

She's right that there are problems though. See the following post by an SEO guy who tested her OWM program on Squidoo and got no-where, but retested on Hubpages and it worked. Food for thought.

http://leodimilo.com/internetmarketingb … -hubpages/

Offline

 

#4 08/09/2009 11:30 am

Cinetech
Active SquidU Commenter
From: Montreal
Registered: 03/16/2007
Posts: 1492

Re: What do people think of PotPieGirls latest article on her blog..

SilverBlueRose wrote:

... about boycotting Squidoo?

http://www.potpiegirl.com/2009/08/shoul … t-squidoo/

Is she just letting off steam or is she serious?

I always have problems trying to figure it what she is trying to say.
Can anybody digest it and post the results?

Offline

 

#5 08/09/2009 11:34 am

pkmcr
Active SquidU Commenter
From: UK
Registered: 09/17/2006
Posts: 2661

Re: What do people think of PotPieGirls latest article on her blog..

I didn't read Jennifer's post like that at all.

She was not saying anything new to be honest.  Indeed she acknowedges as much by her comments around things that Squidoo is already implementing or addressing.  It is a recurring problem with all free site creation sites that people will spam it with page after page about the same topic with a view to ensnare buyers.  To use the example that she used if you do a Google search for "wealthy affiliate Squidoo" (with quote marks) you get 2,160 results.  Do the same search substituting blogspot for Squidoo and you get 2,530 results.

What I think she is saying is that Squidoo will continue to change, some people who are entirely innocent of the sort of spammy tactics that some employ will get caught as approaches are tested and refined. 

So unless I have completely misunderstood she isn't suggesting for one minute that people should boycott Squidoo

Best regards

Paul

Edited for clarity :-)

Last edited by pkmcr (08/09/2009 11:39 am)

Offline

 

#6 08/09/2009 11:35 am

pkmcr
Active SquidU Commenter
From: UK
Registered: 09/17/2006
Posts: 2661

Re: What do people think of PotPieGirls latest article on her blog..

Cinetech wrote:

SilverBlueRose wrote:

... about boycotting Squidoo?

http://www.potpiegirl.com/2009/08/shoul … t-squidoo/

Is she just letting off steam or is she serious?

I always have problems trying to figure it what she is trying to say.
Can anybody digest it and post the results?

Hopefully that's what I have just done LOL - those speed reading and proof reading courses come in useful now and then :-)

Offline

 

#7 08/09/2009 11:41 am

SilverBlueRose
Newbie.
Registered: 12/31/1969
Posts: 60

Re: What do people think of PotPieGirls latest article on her blog..

I read it that she has mixed feelings about Squidoo but can't bring herself to come right out and say it. Possibly down to the fact that people on her course are not getting the results on Squidoo that they used to (see the link to the SEO guy I posted upthread). I think if you are selling courses and something doesn't work you are vulnerable to complaints from those who bought it.

Whereas if you are just an ordinary person using Squidoo, you can afford the trial and error method to get to where it does work, and quite well too.

Offline

 

#8 08/09/2009 12:47 pm

prosperity66
Active SquidU Commenter
From: Squidocean
Registered: 02/24/2007
Posts: 3106

Re: What do people think of PotPieGirls latest article on her blog..

I think the new policies left most of us highly frustrated. Indeed, I personally prefer writing on things I'm comfortable with and  LIKE instead of writing about things I don't like or am not comfortable with. I think it would be dishonest to write on things I don't mind or don't like or ignore! So, for instance, I'm comfortable with business, weight loss (sharing my personal experiences) and holiday season.

History is my passion but I know French history and study it in French and it's hard to translate old vocabulary into plain understable and especially "English-English". That's the reason why I don't write a lot regarding French history. It's almost impossible for me to build a lens with proper English about history.

Ok, what's left to me now? Holiday season. But there's a problem: I don't celebrate holidays like a crazy and can't write 100 different lenses related to whether Halloween, Xmas, Easter or Valentines. I won't be writing on 4th of July as I'm not American; I did one lens on Thanksgiving but once again, I'm not American thus not really interested into this celebration. Here again, I prefer talking about holidays I KNOW and celebrate and not talking about holidays I don't mind, or dislike or prefer to ignore.

Many other people are frustrated because of this. Especially those that bought Jennifer's OWM. It's normal for her to feel vulnerable.

But I've read her post and never understood she would tell people to boycott Squidoo - she remains faithful to the program and that's what makes her a great marketer.

Offline

 

#9 08/09/2009 1:01 pm

pkmcr
Active SquidU Commenter
From: UK
Registered: 09/17/2006
Posts: 2661

Re: What do people think of PotPieGirls latest article on her blog..

prosperity66 wrote:

I think the new policies left most of us highly frustrated. Indeed, I personally prefer writing on things I'm comfortable with and  LIKE instead of writing about things I don't like or am not comfortable with. I think it would be dishonest to write on things I don't mind or don't like or ignore! So, for instance, I'm comfortable with business, weight loss (sharing my personal experiences) and holiday season.

History is my passion but I know French history and study it in French and it's hard to translate old vocabulary into plain understable and especially "English-English". That's the reason why I don't write a lot regarding French history. It's almost impossible for me to build a lens with proper English about history.

Ok, what's left to me now? Holiday season. But there's a problem: I don't celebrate holidays like a crazy and can't write 100 different lenses related to whether Halloween, Xmas, Easter or Valentines. I won't be writing on 4th of July as I'm not American; I did one lens on Thanksgiving but once again, I'm not American thus not really interested into this celebration. Here again, I prefer talking about holidays I KNOW and celebrate and not talking about holidays I don't mind, or dislike or prefer to ignore.

Many other people are frustrated because of this. Especially those that bought Jennifer's OWM. It's normal for her to feel vulnerable.

But I've read her post and never understood she would tell people to boycott Squidoo - she remains faithful to the program and that's what makes her a great marketer.

It's interesting for me at least!  I have been reflecting on the lenses I have been developing of late.  I have found that I am moving more and more to lenses that tap into the areas I am really passionate about such as Learning and Development, NLP, Coaching, Interview Success etc.  There was an interesting post the other day, I think by Megan, about thinking much more about long tail niching (that's probably a made up phrase LOL).  That has been my focus of late to make shorter lenses which focus on a very specific aspect of a particular topic and to link the lenses together much more.

Take care

Paul

Offline

 

#10 08/09/2009 2:23 pm

Chadrew
Active SquidU Commenter
From: Lithuania
Registered: 03/11/2007
Posts: 2435

Re: What do people think of PotPieGirls latest article on her blog..

Apparently some people at WealthyAffiliate forum are not happy with Squidoo's updated SquidDon't list and the fact that they're blocking lenses on WealthyAffiliate now. PotPieGirl's thoughts on this make sense though (this part is about there being 14,000 lenses on "wealthy affiliate" on Squidoo):

Now, applying that thought process to Squidoo… do you really think Squidoo.com wants another page that targets the phrase “wealthy affiliate"  or “wealthy affiliate scam" Really? And trust me, there are LOTS of phrases - especially product names or ‘product name scam’ - that are OVERLY covered on Squidoo.com.

They don’t necessarily want the ‘garden snail’ lenses as much as they want UNIQUE content on UNIQUE keywords and topics.

And why would YOU, the marketer, want to put yet another page on the Squidoo site that targets ‘product name’ or ‘product name scam’? With thousands of pages already in Google from Squidoo.com, why put yourself in such a saturated query space with no hope of being found?

I see nothing wrong with marketers using Squidoo to promote their products, businesses, etc. But that's only if their idea of promoting is not "cut and paste ready-made articles" smile

Last edited by Chadrew (08/09/2009 2:25 pm)

Offline

 

#11 08/09/2009 3:51 pm

BFuniv.com
Positively aquatic
From: Newport Beach, CA
Registered: 11/17/2005
Posts: 357

Re: What do people think of PotPieGirls latest article on her blog..

Read and commented on it (as libertarian leprechaun). The gist is that if you want control, have your own site. Even then Squidoo has value. She still highly recommends Squidoo, and recognizes its Google juice, even if she doesn't call it that. Her advice, check first and be sure there are not thousands of lenses already on your subject. Start developing your own site when appropriate.

My take: There is risk whenever you rely on others, but community has value.

Take a look at her lenses, they are not cut and paste, and they are well constructed for their purpose. I bought her e-book even though I'm not an online marketer. Occasionally I have a few relevant links. She also supports her users, the blog is worth a regular read.


cyberhug.me trilogy: hacktivists fighting for human rights
about me
free download of *hacker school*

Offline

 

#12 08/10/2009 5:38 am

musocat
Newbie.
Registered: 09/23/2007
Posts: 10

Re: What do people think of PotPieGirls latest article on her blog..

I think some people are misunderstanding her post. It was written in response to recent discussions on the Wealthy Affiliate forum (of which I'm a member), where some people were talking about boycotting Squidoo in response to the latest tightening of the rules (they were in niches like weight loss etc, and have had lenses locked). PPG isn't agreeing with them - she's saying that it's understandable why Squidoo are cracking down, and is just suggesting that if people want complete freedom to write about whatever they want without risk of getting their content deleted, they should have their own site. She's been very supportive of Squidoo when responding to the detractors, and certainly isn't suggesting a boycott : )

Last edited by musocat (08/10/2009 5:39 am)

Offline

 

#13 08/10/2009 6:41 am

RickPhillips
Active SquidU Commenter
From: georgia
Registered: 03/21/2006
Posts: 1395

Re: What do people think of PotPieGirls latest article on her blog..

The Hub article in this thread is the most interesting of all.


Alan Guth, Edmund Husserl, `Bucky' Fuller - Real Thinkers

Offline

 

#14 08/10/2009 6:50 am

SilverBlueRose
Newbie.
Registered: 12/31/1969
Posts: 60

Re: What do people think of PotPieGirls latest article on her blog..

RickPhillips wrote:

The Hub article in this thread is the most interesting of all.

Yup, eye-opener wasn't it?

Offline

 

#15 08/10/2009 7:13 am

Janet21
Active SquidU Commenter
From: Birthday Party Central
Registered: 01/05/2007
Posts: 3407

Re: What do people think of PotPieGirls latest article on her blog..

SilverBlueRose wrote:

RickPhillips wrote:

The Hub article in this thread is the most interesting of all.

Yup, eye-opener wasn't it?

It is true about Hubpages.  Hubs get indexed quickly and organic traffic begins almost immediately.   I have 38 hubs that bring in between 1,300-1,600 pageviews a day with little to no promotion.   My lenses tend to struggle.  Right now I get about 950 pageviews a day on 100 lenses.


Earn Money with Squidoo * Earn Money with Hubpages
God Grant Me the Serenity to Accept the Things I Cannot Change, Courage to Change the Things I Can and Wisdom to Know the Difference

Offline

 

#16 08/10/2009 7:20 am

susannaduffy
SquidU Leadership Council | Forum mod
From: Melbourne.au
Registered: 09/24/2006
Posts: 9365

Re: What do people think of PotPieGirls latest article on her blog..

I still don't know what potpie girl said - I'm never sure what she says at the best of times
However,  if the wealthy affiliate cast of thousands are boycotting squidoo, I can only breathe a sigh of relief and look forward to getting some time to work on my own projects instead of wading through the same junky lenses from them (well, from MOST of them)

Offline

 

#17 08/10/2009 10:18 am

Kate-Phizackerley
Active SquidU Commenter
From: London
Registered: 10/05/2008
Posts: 1902

Re: What do people think of PotPieGirls latest article on her blog..

I'm very happy about the tightening of the SquidDon'ts.  That's very positive.  Trouble is spammy lenses I can ignored have been replaced by spammy ads on my lenses and that's very negative.

Kate

Offline

 

#18 08/10/2009 11:49 am

mysticmama
Active SquidU Commenter
From: Planet Earth
Registered: 01/08/2009
Posts: 3273

Re: What do people think of PotPieGirls latest article on her blog..

Let me say upfront that I really like PotPieGirl's OWM and think it is a great value for the price, with lots of excellent SEO info & she also gives lots of free follow-up info every week...

But... I also see way too many terrible, copy & paste, spammy lenses that are very obviously made by people who are following the OWM plan...

I personally never actually followed the plan... I use my OWM info for the SEO & promotional info... not for the plan itself, which If I'm totally honest, just seemed way too morally questionable for me personally...but I have honesty issues...I can't personally live with myself if I do dishonest or even questionable things... so I guess I was never cut out to be a good affiliate marketer... because I just can't lie & try to get people to buy crappy get rich schemes that don't work,  just so I can make money....

This moral issue I have is why I quit Wealthy Affiliate... which in my opinion has absolutely no redeming qualities... it's just a bunch of people who get together to come up with new ways to scam people so they can profit from it... and the whole thing just made me kind of sick... but that's just me

I hear all these stories about how these affiliate marketers are getting so rich... but after seeing it in action, the way they prey on desperate people and then profit from selling tham empty "time management" ,~ "Weight Loss" ~ "Online Marketing" ~ "Real Estate"  ~ etc...programs that basically just contain the same info they would get for free from a google search... or the whole pyramid scheme of WA or even bum marketing for that matter... where the guys on top are the only ones really making any real money... and the people actually pay a monthly fee to go out and recruit more members so the guy on top can keep getting richer... well the whole thing just makes me disgusted....

Still, I do think that PotPieGirl's OWM is a good investment, just for the SEO & promotional info, that yes I could have gotten elsewhere, but it would have taken a lot longer... so it is worth the cost, just like a game instruction manuel is worth the cost to a gamer... sure the gamer would eventually figure out GTA4 on his own, but having the book is sweet when he gets stuck, or the second time around when he wants to know all the cheats and secrets...

As far as Squidoo being possibly boycotted by WA members ~ I say good, let them all go over to hubpages or whatever...I just don't see how having less spammy, copy & paste crappy "get rich" or "Lose weight magically" lenses could hurt Squidoo... no if anything, being rid of those spammy lenses will only make Squidoo a better place for the rest of us, who are actually taking more time than five minutes to copy & paste a lens together...

And please don't get me wrong, I have nothing against the affiliate marketers who are taking the time to make quality, original content lenses to sell products that they have actually personally tried and know that the product works...which is why I have no problem with OWM, because I have used the product, and it has been a big help for me, even if I don't follow the plan... which actually speaks volumes for how good it is, because to me...the plan is OWM's weakest point & the product is able to stand alone even without it smile

I think that with Internet growth at an all time high... & so many people trying to be affiliate marketers... that the AM market is about to crash & burn soon anyway... I mean really... after awhile it's like there really is no one left to fall for the "get rich quick" schemes... and once the guys on top of these pyramids realize that they have bottomed out... they will move on to the next thing they can use to dupe people out of money...and all of these wannabe AM's will go back to their day jobs because... hey they still have bills to pay!

I believe that the powers that be at Squidoo have forseen that the whole AM thing is on the down slide and getting ready to crash & burn... and that in their infinite wisdom they know that quality informational lenses that are well written and entertaining will survive... and that when the dust finally settles, Squidoo will still be standing strong, because they invested their energy into recruiting the best freelance writers on the web, rather than giving into the "spammers"...and the high quality of a Squidoo that is porn & spam free, will inevitably outlive other sites that are just going for the quick buck.

Offline

 

#19 08/10/2009 12:05 pm

pkmcr
Active SquidU Commenter
From: UK
Registered: 09/17/2006
Posts: 2661

Re: What do people think of PotPieGirls latest article on her blog..

Bambi can I just say that is an excellent post - and just about sums up much of what I feel.

Thanks for taking the time to share your thoughts at some length.

Take care

Paul

Offline

 

#20 08/10/2009 3:37 pm

prosperity66
Active SquidU Commenter
From: Squidocean
Registered: 02/24/2007
Posts: 3106

Re: What do people think of PotPieGirls latest article on her blog..

mysticmama wrote:

And please don't get me wrong, I have nothing against the affiliate marketers who are taking the time to make quality, original content lenses to sell products that they have actually personally tried and know that the product works...which is why I have no problem with OWM, because I have used the product, and it has been a big help for me, even if I don't follow the plan... which actually speaks volumes for how good it is, because to me...the plan is OWM's weakest point & the product is able to stand alone even without it smile

Unfortunately, those people are penalized too... as well as those that aren't selling anything but just teach others how to do things.

Offline

 

#21 08/10/2009 4:52 pm

mysticmama
Active SquidU Commenter
From: Planet Earth
Registered: 01/08/2009
Posts: 3273

Re: What do people think of PotPieGirls latest article on her blog..

prosperity66 wrote:

mysticmama wrote:

And please don't get me wrong, I have nothing against the affiliate marketers who are taking the time to make quality, original content lenses to sell products that they have actually personally tried and know that the product works...which is why I have no problem with OWM, because I have used the product, and it has been a big help for me, even if I don't follow the plan... which actually speaks volumes for how good it is, because to me...the plan is OWM's weakest point & the product is able to stand alone even without it smile

Unfortunately, those people are penalized too... as well as those that aren't selling anything but just teach others how to do things.

the only way people who are making quality Affiliate Marketing lenses could be penalized, would be if they were making lenses about the forbidden or blacklisted subjects... which if this is the case, then they were sadly mistaken in thinking that their lens was high quality in the first place...
the banned subject matter is banned for good reason... I'm sorry but I have yet to see a non-spammy lens in the banned categories...

Many may argue that their weight loss lenses are high quality because they tell their personal weight loss story...
As someone who has struggled with weight issues my entire life...I am well aware of the fact that "weight loss" is a billion dollar Industry...
I am also well aware that the reason it is a $$$ industry is because over-weight people are desperate & vunerable...
Which is why (and this is just my personal opinion) any weight loss story lens that sells even one so-called weight loss product = spam in my book, even if the lensmaster used said product and it really did work for them... because, in reality all of the products work...but that doesn't mean that it is the miracle cure these desperate people are looking for...

All of the miracle products on Earth won't help someone who isn't ready to completely change their eating habits & lifestyle
Also many people, like me in an earlier time of my life have genetic conditions where these products don't work, lifestyle changes don't work & in reality these products can actually make matters worse... All these miracle weight loss products just give people false hope while someone else profits from their desperation...it's really very sad...

If people want to tell their personal weight loss story without trying to sell Acai berry or ephedrine, just because it's an inspirational story...then I doubt very highly that it would end up in the Spam filter... but no matter how well written a weight-loss or other banned subject lens is...if it is trying to sell something to people who are vulnerable, then I'm glad it's banned...and glad to be a member of a site like Squidoo that doesn't encourage people to profit from other people's misery.

On a really weird side note...at the age of 40 I was diagnosed with graves disease... now I need to consume 10,000 or more calories a day to keep from losing weight & to maintain a healthy weight... which would probably be really cool, except I had gastric bypass surgery in 2001...so I can only each about 1 cup of food at a sitting... so now I eat like 10 meals a day, constant snacking and always eat the most fattening foods I can find... Life likes to pull crazy stuff like this on us smile

Offline

 

#22 08/10/2009 5:10 pm

mysticmama
Active SquidU Commenter
From: Planet Earth
Registered: 01/08/2009
Posts: 3273

Re: What do people think of PotPieGirls latest article on her blog..

prosperity66 wrote:

mysticmama wrote:

And please don't get me wrong, I have nothing against the affiliate marketers who are taking the time to make quality, original content lenses to sell products that they have actually personally tried and know that the product works...which is why I have no problem with OWM, because I have used the product, and it has been a big help for me, even if I don't follow the plan... which actually speaks volumes for how good it is, because to me...the plan is OWM's weakest point & the product is able to stand alone even without it smile

Unfortunately, those people are penalized too... as well as those that aren't selling anything but just teach others how to do things.

Okay...so you got me curious, so I just had to go see your weight loss lenses...
And I'm sorry...but the Cabbage Soup diet is sooooooooooo unhealthy, my Mom ended up hospitalized for malnutrition from that one even though she was still fat!

Atkins & south Beach both have people who have actually died because of those diets sad

I guess my feeling is that unless you are a medical doctor, you really should not be giving people diet advice...
At least for me personally... I just couldn't make those types of lenses and still live with myself... I would just feel awful if someone took my bad diet advice and died...

I know that lots of people make tons of money selling weight loss products... like I said before it is a billion dollar industry...
but for me...I would just feel like a criminal selling that junk... which is why I'm just not cut out to be a successful Affiliate Marketer...
I also would feel like a criminal selling forex junk, or any of the other get rich quick programs & products that prey on desperate people...
I would always wonder how many people destroyed their lives or committed suicide because they believed my scam & spent their time & money on some worthless get rich quick scheme that I was trying to hawk...

I have to live with myself and I personally just couldn't feel good about myself profitting from stuff like that, but that really is just me...I'm sure lots of other people have no problem who they hurt as long as they make $$$... myself, I would rather be poor & honest

Offline

 

#23 08/10/2009 6:33 pm

susannaduffy
SquidU Leadership Council | Forum mod
From: Melbourne.au
Registered: 09/24/2006
Posts: 9365

Re: What do people think of PotPieGirls latest article on her blog..

So no one can actually sum up what potpie said?

Offline

 

#24 08/10/2009 6:43 pm

xtnshun
Active SquidU Commenter
From: Reston, VA
Registered: 05/23/2007
Posts: 780

Re: What do people think of PotPieGirls latest article on her blog..

susannaduffy wrote:

So no one can actually sum up what potpie said?

Apparently not.

Offline

 

#25 08/10/2009 6:45 pm

mysticmama
Active SquidU Commenter
From: Planet Earth
Registered: 01/08/2009
Posts: 3273

Re: What do people think of PotPieGirls latest article on her blog..

susannaduffy wrote:

So no one can actually sum up what potpie said?

Not really because the post is just a comment on her WA post which you can only see if you have a wealthy affiliates membership... so to read it without being able to also read the WA post that it is referring to, would be taking it out of context...

like I said I tried WA, but it was too sleazy for me...but maybe someone else who is a WA member can explaine it in context for us?

Offline

 

Board footer

Powered by PunBB
© Copyright 2002–2005 Rickard Andersson