*The Forum Rules.
Yep, rules. Read 'em. Abide by 'em. Or your sea creature powers may be revoked. Temporarily, or for good.
1. New to the lounge? Get started here. Learn which category to post your note in, and create a forum signature.
2. Spam: just don't do it. Thou also shalt not fill the forums with multiple threads on the same topic, sockpuppet, or link to irrelevant and non-Squidoo sites (includes signatures).
3. Thou shalt not flame, harass, denigrate, spam, malign, or otherwise finger-point and name-call at ANYONE. This one's a biggy. This too can get you banned.
4. Squidstaff love interacting with smart front-line people, so they stop by the forums from time to time to hear your ideas and share updates. However, this isn't the place to post bugs or solicit admin action. Please send those requests through our feedback link.
5. The SquidU forum is a place for users to interact, to share ideas and inspiration (and yes, gripes... maybe another lensmaster can help) and have fun with their lenses. Try searching for an answer or visiting The Answer Deck.
And my dashboard proves it.
The mistakes within the weighting is beyond belief.
To detail the mess, I'd have to expend far more energy than the .08 that my lens with 58,000 lifetime visits, over 50 ratings, with sales, with over 70,000 clickouts has.
Offline

Lensrank is a performance indicator on recent activity. It doesn't take into account the history of the lens.
The payout is determined on how it performed two months ago.
The performance of your lens last year doesn't determine todays Lensrank.
Unless your 58,000 visits, 50 ratings, sales and 70,000 clickouts happened this week I can't see what point your dashboard has proved or how you've managed to interpret it.
Offline
I feel your pain. We all do. But all we can do is wait this out at least a few more days. I know this morning my lensrank is even worse and it is making it hard to motivate myself. BUT they are working on it so hopefully things will look better in the near future. I admit to being very hopeful that today things would look better. Patience is not my thing. Perhaps I should take a few days off from Squidoo and concentrate on other things.
Offline
Feeling the pain here too ![]()
With all due respect Glen, if the problems of Lens Rank is not corrected by the end of April, our current (and assuming still dropping) lens rank will greatly affect all of us for our royalty payments in June.
So I can see where Rick feels that his work has been worthless, as it will eventually show in his royalties.
edited: to explain a little better; I'm assuming that Rick is seeing his LR for that lens plummet, although he hasn't stated how much. He does give a hint, however; because he stated .08, which would reflect a lens that was either in a LR of above 10,000 for yesterdays payment (March's stats) or he is comparing it's current LR to yesterday's LR cutoffs. Rick chose to portray that lens as being a successful one by stating it's accomplishments.
Gods Love and mine,
Deb
Last edited by flowergardener (04/09/2008 5:36 am)
Offline
I believe Gil said that there's something wrong with LR and that he'll investigate.
There's something wrong with some of my lenses too; my top one is steadily falling day by day (over 1.800 weekly search engine visitors, 29 ratings, LR 950; used to be ~120 before the server move). I will refrain from creating topics on this or filing a bug report because there are so many users suffering from these problems. I'll complain if it's still wrong (in my opinion of course) even after they investigate and fix the LR problems ![]()
Edited to add, why I think it's wrong: lenses with less traffic (many times less, in fact) and less ratings are ranking much higher. Even my own lenses, in fact. That can't be right.
Last edited by Chadrew (04/09/2008 5:15 am)
Offline
N376 wrote:
Lensrank is a performance indicator on recent activity. It doesn't take into account the history of the lens.
The payout is determined on how it performed two months ago.
The performance of your lens last year doesn't determine todays Lensrank.
Unless your 58,000 visits, 50 ratings, sales and 70,000 clickouts happened this week I can't see what point your dashboard has proved or how you've managed to interpret it.
One question - I thought lensrank did take account of ratings? Or is that just ratings in the last two weeks too?
Offline

xtnshun wrote:
N376 wrote:
Lensrank is a performance indicator on recent activity. It doesn't take into account the history of the lens.
The payout is determined on how it performed two months ago.
The performance of your lens last year doesn't determine todays Lensrank.
Unless your 58,000 visits, 50 ratings, sales and 70,000 clickouts happened this week I can't see what point your dashboard has proved or how you've managed to interpret it.One question - I thought lensrank did take account of ratings? Or is that just ratings in the last two weeks too?
It does. But Lensrank fluctuates on account of other peoples performance. So the ratings you got a month ago, won't mean anything today.
Offline

There definately appears to be some sort of bug here now that I look at this again. However, this bug is actually working in my favor. With the exception of my top lens dropping like a rock (from #11 to #34 today), I have 25 lenses in the top 2,000. I can't remember the last time I had that many lenses in the top tier! Usually I have between 10-15 in this tier. Not sure what is going on, but it does seem kinda wacky. Gil and hq are working on it as their top priority so we just need to hang tight.
Offline

flowergardener wrote:
With all due respect Glen, if the problems of Lens Rank is not corrected by the end of April, our current (and assuming still dropping) lens rank will greatly affect all of us for our royalty payments in June.
So I can see where Rick feels that his work has been worthless, as it will eventually show in his royalties.
I can't argument with what you've said here. I'm just at a loss to figure out how Rick's sales and past performance relate to how his Lenses are ranking today.
Offline
Janet21 wrote:
There definately appears to be some sort of bug here now that I look at this again. However, this bug is actually working in my favor. With the exception of my top lens dropping like a rock (from #11 to #34 today), I have 25 lenses in the top 2,000.
Janet me too
my top lens has dropped lower than i would have hoped (and it's no longer my top lens)...but overall ranks are in my favor...i have 31 in the top 2,000
Last edited by Christene (04/09/2008 5:57 am)
Offline
My Stats are about the same as Janet's and Christene's I've now got 41 in the Top 2,000.
The weird thing I suppose is that I made 2 news lens in the past few days. Both have gotten 6-8 Stars and 28-30 hits. They are still sitting in the LR of 67,000 to 70,000.
In the past they would have gone up to about 15,000 to 20,000.
Although I am certainly not complaining about have 41 lenses in the Top Tier : )
Last edited by bdkz (04/09/2008 6:37 am)
Offline
I'm still having the opposite problem.
New lenses that were published during the time of the server shift are staying stuck in the 60,000 range despite new information, angel blessings, traffic and getting 'stars.'
Hopefully this won't be a trend with new lenses.
P.S. I also have more than my normal number of lenses in the top tier.
14 above 1,000
24 above 2,000
P.P.S. bdkz thanks for noting the same problem with new lenses. I hadn't been seeing much addressing new lenses.
Possibly more
Offline
****watching the gallery, then shooting my little water gun at my ponies on the track for all I'm worth, huffing and puffing in the race****
You guys took my three above2000 ranked lenses and made those ponies lose their place... you lensrankbandits... I'm a'comin'.....
Last edited by rockycha (04/09/2008 6:40 am)
Offline
I am having similar Lensrank issues but I am new so I don't know if they are problems or just what I should expect. I have published 2 lenses in the last 5 days. Both have got 10+ star ratings and 10ish visits per day but their lens ranks are both 70000 and below. Is this normal?
Offline
Rocky!
I'm a comin too............. *strapping on my son's super-duper soaker with shoulder straps to hold the water tank on my back toy that's 18 years old an still works*
*makes me feel like Bill Murray in the GhostBuster movies* ![]()
Deb
Offline
For those that have not been reading the other threads, here's an overview of the important facts:
Gil says they have not changed how lensrank calculates except for this -
Gil wrote:
The only Lensrank change we've made recently is to slowly decrease the weight of Angel blessings over a period of weeks. This is to make sure that it doesn't become impossible to get into our Top 100 lists without massive amounts of Angel blessings.
Beyond that, I will definitely keep an eye on lensrank to see if there are any larger issues.
After a lot of posts on weird Lensrank issues, Gil posted this -
giltotherescue wrote:
There's definitely something not quite right about lensrank. I'm looking into it ASAP.
This is a response from Squidoo HQ in reply to my bug report on the lensrank dance.
Hello Crystal,
I just chatted with Gil about lensrank and he's working on it today as
his top priority. There are some impacts from our recent server move
that were unexpected, so he is fixing that.
I'm not sure of all the details, but I do know this is his #1 project
right now, so please keep an eye on it and let us know if you don't see
a positive change in the next couple of days.
Thanks again for being so patient!
Blake
Hope that catches everyone up to speed. It is very frustrating, but at least we know Gil is working on it and will hopefully get it straightened out soon.
Offline
I am trying to be patient. I know all the lensrank stuff will get worked out. My biggest problem right now are the newly published lenses that aren't moving out of WIP. Can't join groups, can't send casts. I'm trying to promote them in other ways because you can access the page, but it's just frustrating that I can't take care of this other stuff.
Offline

Crystal_Booth wrote:
For those that have not been reading the other threads, here's an overview of the important facts:
Gil says they have not changed how lensrank calculates except for this -Gil wrote:
The only Lensrank change we've made recently is to slowly decrease the weight of Angel blessings over a period of weeks. This is to make sure that it doesn't become impossible to get into our Top 100 lists without massive amounts of Angel blessings.
Beyond that, I will definitely keep an eye on lensrank to see if there are any larger issues.After a lot of posts on weird Lensrank issues, Gil posted this -
giltotherescue wrote:
There's definitely something not quite right about lensrank. I'm looking into it ASAP.
This is a response from Squidoo HQ in reply to my bug report on the lensrank dance.
Hello Crystal,
I just chatted with Gil about lensrank and he's working on it today as
his top priority. There are some impacts from our recent server move
that were unexpected, so he is fixing that.
I'm not sure of all the details, but I do know this is his #1 project
right now, so please keep an eye on it and let us know if you don't see
a positive change in the next couple of days.
Thanks again for being so patient!
BlakeHope that catches everyone up to speed. It is very frustrating, but at least we know Gil is working on it and will hopefully get it straightened out soon.
Thanks for posting all this, Crystal!
I'll admit I've been quietly freaking out. OK, I can handle a drop from #1 to #4
- but down to #40 overnight? I only have 6 lenses, but they have all been pretty regularly in the top 1500. But 3 are now in the 3000's .. with 2 almost at 4,000. Yet they still have as much traffic if not more than usual.
I'm all for correction (and I'm delighted that the overall quality of lenses is growing!) and I agree with the slow dissipation of the Angel Blessing value, but such a precipitous drop is upsetting.
Offline
Your welcome, Kate. I think a lot of us have been freaking out, some quietly, and others with a load roar! It is very upsetting to see our lenses that have done well for so long plummet with nothing we can do about it.
I've posted all about my lenses over in the Server Swap Bug Update thread http://www.squidu.com/forum/viewtopic.php?id=13405 so I won't post them again here, but just know you're not the only one.
I really hope Gil gets this straightened out soon. I'm stressing so bad about what I'm going to have to to regain my former LR and popularity. Please hurry Gil!!!
Offline
While we're at it, let me share what I'm feeling right now. I was off to a good start with my one lens three weeks ago. My ranking steadily climbed. Then when we had the server swap, my ranking plummeted, like bonkers. That got me thinking about word press and other means. For 2 days, didn't feel the motivation to add content. This is the 3rd day and I still have no motivation whatsoever. Will I bounce back? Dunno. From a ranking of 300+ to 1,200+, how does that affect my adrenalin levels? The only good thing about it is that for some reason, google is starting to notice me. Go figure.
Offline

Oh, thanks for that link, Crystal! It's obviously happening to lots of folks which makes me feel better (shared sorrow is half the sorrow).
All my best thoughts are being sent to Gil and HQ right now. This can't be fun for them and they really do love what they do and what we do.
Fingers and toes crossed for Gil. And remembering to breathe.
Offline

ques2008 wrote:
While we're at it, let me share what I'm feeling right now. I was off to a good start with my one lens three weeks ago. My ranking steadily climbed. Then when we had the server swap, my ranking plummeted, like bonkers. That got me thinking about word press and other means. For 2 days, didn't feel the motivation to add content. This is the 3rd day and I still have no motivation whatsoever. Will I bounce back? Dunno. From a ranking of 300+ to 1,200+, how does that affect my adrenalin levels? The only good thing about it is that for some reason, google is starting to notice me. Go figure.
PLEASE don't give up on Squidoo due to a bump in the road! Squidoo is growing at such a rapid pace (and that's a good thing!) that there are bound to be growing pains which can lead to frustration. However, Squidoo is still awesome and in the long run it is just going to get better! You'll see. I know it is very hard, but don't dwell on lensrank right now. Give it a few days. HQ is working on it and I, like many here, have complete faith that they will solve the issues at hand. Like Greek said, they are functioning on a four person workforce so they can offer us FREE pages and FREE ways to make money! Let's not lose sight of that.
Hang in there and keep working, creating and updating your lenses! Things will get better. ![]()
Offline
Janet21 wrote:
Hang in there and keep working, creating and updating your lenses! Things will get better.
Well said!
Squidoo has just paid me fifty bucks, that can't be bad can it ![]()
Offline
Janet21 wrote:
ques2008 wrote:
While we're at it, let me share what I'm feeling right now. I was off to a good start with my one lens three weeks ago. My ranking steadily climbed. Then when we had the server swap, my ranking plummeted, like bonkers. That got me thinking about word press and other means. For 2 days, didn't feel the motivation to add content. This is the 3rd day and I still have no motivation whatsoever. Will I bounce back? Dunno. From a ranking of 300+ to 1,200+, how does that affect my adrenalin levels? The only good thing about it is that for some reason, google is starting to notice me. Go figure.
PLEASE don't give up on Squidoo due to a bump in the road! Squidoo is growing at such a rapid pace (and that's a good thing!) that there are bound to be growing pains which can lead to frustration. However, Squidoo is still awesome and in the long run it is just going to get better! You'll see. I know it is very hard, but don't dwell on lensrank right now. Give it a few days. HQ is working on it and I, like many here, have complete faith that they will solve the issues at hand. Like Greek said, they are functioning on a four person workforce so they can offer us FREE pages and FREE ways to make money! Let's not lose sight of that.
Hang in there and keep working, creating and updating your lenses! Things will get better.
Janet's right. We might all be complaining right now, but all of us lensmasters who have been around for a while, now that you have to take the good with the bad. I've been a member for just over a year and I am still competely loyal to Squidoo, even with my ranting. Our dear devoted Squid Team are very small, but they work very hard, sometimes through their night, or weekends, off to make Squidoo work properly for us. This is just a bump in the road and things will get better. If you lens was doing well before, it should go back up once Gil finds and fixes the problem.
Offline
I am wondering if age had become a bigger factor in lensrank. It seems like we are hearing some of the more experience squidooers are seeing a pretty good bump in their lenses while some of us newbies are losing ground. I have 7 lenses that are all the same just covering different topics. In general they have always ranked very near each other as long as they have had comprabably visits. But now I am seeing a drop in some of my newer lenses. It is actually interesting. The seven lenses are now ordered according to their age...even though the amount of visits are significantly different between them.
Maybe not, but I know the good captain posted about this in his blog as well.
Offline